The Processing Center was all white walls and soft lighting, the kind of place designed to make you feel like you were getting a dental cleaning instead of being charged with crimes committed 175 years before you were born.
Bobby sat in an interview room across from a woman named Dr. Elizabeth Chen, who had the title of “Historical Context Analyst” and the demeanor of someone who’d never told a joke in her life. She was maybe thirty-five, with dark hair pulled back in a bun so tight it looked painful, and the kind of posture that came from years of being told that excellence was the only acceptable outcome.
On the wall behind her, a soft-glow screen displayed the seal of the Department of Ancestral Accountability: scales of justice balanced on a double helix, with the motto “Healing History Forward” in that particular font that graphic designers used when they wanted something to feel both modern and timeless and ended up with neither.
“Mr. Garrett,” Dr. Chen said, pulling up a holographic display between them. “I’m going to show you some content. Please be advised that this material contains language and sentiments that modern society finds deeply harmful.”
Her voice was soft, modulated, the kind of voice they trained into you at expensive universities where everyone learned to discuss atrocities over catered lunch. Bobby had heard that voice before—from his ex-wife’s divorce attorney, from the HR rep who’d explained his demotion at the plant, from every bureaucrat who’d ever delivered bad news while maintaining perfect eye contact and a sympathetic head tilt.
It was the voice of someone who believed they were helping.
“Okay,” Bobby said, because what else do you say?
The first image appeared. It was a screenshot from something called Twitter—Bobby had heard of it in history classes, back when they still taught history instead of “Historical Grievance Studies.” The interface looked ancient, all flat colors and simple icons, like something from a museum exhibit about primitive communication.
The post was dated March 15th, 2024:
@JimGarrett74: “Just spent 20 minutes trying to explain to my son why his participation trophy matters. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t. #HardTruths #OldSchoolDad”
Bobby read it twice, waiting for the other shoe to drop. It didn’t. That was it. Thirty-seven words and two hashtags.
“That’s it?” he asked.
“That’s exhibit A of 1,247,” Dr. Chen said, her expression carefully neutral. “This post promoted toxic masculinity, diminished the psychological wellbeing of youth, and contributed to generational trauma.”
Bobby felt something rising in his chest—a laugh, maybe, or a scream. It was hard to tell which. His great-great-grandfather had been worried about participation trophies. Meanwhile, Bobby’s own daughter was being raised in a world where saying the wrong thing could get your descendants arrested.
“It’s a dad joke about participation trophies,” Bobby said carefully.
“It’s violence, Mr. Garrett. Linguistic violence.”
There it was. The word that had replaced every other word when people ran out of actual arguments. Violence. As if letters on a screen could punch you in the face. As if jokes were the same as fists.
Bobby had learned, over the years, that there were two types of people in the world: those who understood that words were just words, and those who’d figured out that calling words violence gave you power over the people who used them. The second group had been winning for about a century now.
“You’re prosecuting my great-great-grandfather for dad jokes?” Bobby asked, trying to keep his voice level.
Dr. Chen’s expression didn’t change. She probably practiced it in the mirror every morning, along with her affirmations and green smoothie. “We’re prosecuting you for your ancestor’s systematic pattern of harmful digital behavior. The jokes, as you call them, are merely symptomatic of a deeper pathology.”
She scrolled through more posts. Bobby watched his ancestor’s Twitter history unfold like an archaeological dig through the early 21st century: complaints about office coffee, opinions on movies, photos of burnt dinners, memes about Monday mornings. The detritus of an ordinary life, now catalogued and categorized as evidence of moral failure.
@JimGarrett74: “Coffee is coffee. Stop trying to make it complicated. #JustBrewIt”
“This post,” Dr. Chen explained, “minimizes the cultural significance of specialty coffee preparation, which has roots in African and Indigenous traditions. It’s culinary erasure.”
@JimGarrett74: “Remember when music was actually about music? No? Just me? #GrumpyOldMan”
“Age-based superiority bias and dismissal of contemporary artistic expression,” Chen continued, as if reading from a script. Which, Bobby realized, she probably was. Everything was scripted now. Every interaction, every response, every expression of outrage or sympathy or concern. They’d automated emotion the same way they’d automated everything else.
@JimGarrett74: “Tried to watch that new superhero movie. Fell asleep. Woke up. Same fight scene still happening.”
“Demonstrates contempt for cultural products important to younger demographics,” Dr. Chen said. “Part of a broader pattern of generational hostility.”
Bobby leaned back in his chair. It was the kind of chair that was supposed to be ergonomic but mostly just made your back hurt in new and interesting ways. Outside the interview room, he could hear the soft hum of the Processing Center—voices, footsteps, the electronic chirp of systems processing other people’s ancestral sins.
How many rooms like this were there? How many Dr. Chens, sitting across from how many Bobby Garretts, explaining how their great-great-grandfathers’ opinions about coffee were actually weapons of mass destruction?
“Here’s one from 2022,” Dr. Chen said, highlighting a post with a tap of her finger. The hologram pulsed. “@JimGarrett74: ‘Remember when you could tell a joke without running it past the HR department first? Pepperidge Farm remembers.’”
“He’s quoting a commercial,” Bobby said.
“He’s minimizing the importance of workplace sensitivity protocols.”
“He’s making a Family Guy reference.”
“Intent is irrelevant, Mr. Garrett. Impact is what matters.”
And there it was. The other great discovery of the 21st century, right up there with renewable energy and gene therapy: the revelation that you could judge anyone for anything as long as you focused on how it made someone, somewhere, hypothetically feel. Intent didn’t matter. Context didn’t matter. The actual words barely mattered. What mattered was the great invisible calculus of harm, measured in units that only the experts could see, tallied by algorithms that only the righteous could trust.
Dr. Chen closed the hologram with a gesture that looked like she was swatting a fly. “Mr. Garrett, your great-great-grandfather’s digital footprint demonstrates a consistent pattern of what we now recognize as microaggression accumulation. Over seven years, he posted 1,247 items that violated modern standards of inclusive communication.”
“Modern standards that didn’t exist when he posted them,” Bobby said.
“Morality isn’t temporal, Mr. Garrett. Wrong is wrong, regardless of when it occurred.”
Bobby thought about this. It was the kind of logic that sounded smart until you actually thought about it, which meant it was the kind of logic that ran the world. Always had, probably always would. Mark Twain wrote a whole book about it once, though they’d banned that too, for reasons Bobby couldn’t quite remember but suspected had something to do with a raft and a river and saying things out loud that everyone was thinking anyway.
“So what happens now?” Bobby asked.
“You’ll be tried under the Ancestral Accountability Act. If convicted, you’ll serve corrective rehabilitation proportional to the severity of your ancestor’s offenses.”
The words were so clean, so clinical. Corrective rehabilitation. As if they could fix him, adjust him, tune him like a radio until he broadcast on the right frequency.
“How long?” he asked.
Dr. Chen consulted her display. “Based on preliminary offense scoring, you’re looking at seven to twelve years. Plus mandatory social re-education and a permanent notation on your citizen record.”
Seven to twelve years.
For tweets.
For dad jokes.
For the crime of having a great-great-grandfather who’d lived in a time when people still said what they thought without checking an algorithm first.
Bobby felt the room tilt slightly, or maybe that was just his sense of reality trying to find a new equilibrium. Twelve years. Lena would be twenty-nine. She’d be an adult, living a life he’d miss. Birthdays, graduations, boyfriends or girlfriends or whatever the hell people called relationships now. All gone, vaporized, because someone five generations back had complained about office coffee on the internet.
“Can I ask you something?” Bobby said.
Dr. Chen looked up from her display. “Of course.”
“Do you really think this is justice?”
For just a moment—maybe it was Bobby’s imagination, maybe it was wishful thinking, maybe it was real—something flickered behind Dr. Chen’s carefully maintained expression. Doubt, maybe. Or recognition. The look of someone who’d woken up one day to find themselves working in a slaughterhouse and had simply decided to accept it because the alternative was admitting they’d wasted years of their life in service of something monstrous.
“Justice is what the system says it is,” she said finally. “Now, please review the formal charges on your datapad. You have seventy-two hours before trial.”
She stood. The interview was over. Bobby remained seated, staring at the space where the hologram had been, where his great-great-grandfather’s words had hung in the air like evidence of original sin.
Dr. Chen paused at the door. “Mr. Garrett?”
“Yeah?”
“Your daughter. Lena.” Chen’s voice had changed, just slightly. Less script, more human. “She’s been flagged for insufficient ancestral repudiation. There’s a notice in her school account.”
Bobby’s blood went cold. “What does that mean?”
“It means she needs to submit a formal statement condemning your ancestor’s behavior. If she doesn’t, it could affect her educational placement, her citizen score, her future opportunities.”
“She’s seventeen years old.”
“Old enough to understand accountability,” Dr. Chen said. Then, softer: “I’m sorry. I thought you should know.”
She left. The door sealed behind her with a soft pneumatic hiss. And Bobby Garrett sat alone in a room designed to look gentle while it broke you, thinking about his daughter, his great-great-grandfather, and all the space between them that somehow added up to this.
| <– Chapter 1 | Chapter 3 –> |